More agents won't
give you confidence.

You need better agents.

Not more of them.

agentsquadai.com/en
01 / 08

The industry is selling quantity.

"10 agents that coordinate"
"Your own AI swarm"
"An automated chain of 12 models"

Reliability doesn't add up.

It compounds down.

agentsquadai.com/en
02 / 08

10 agents at 95% each
give you a 60% system.

Every step multiplies the error.

3 steps   =  86%
5 steps   =  77%
10 steps =  60%

Every agent did its job right.

The system fails 2 out of 5 times.

And no one is to blame.

agentsquadai.com/en
03 / 08

Berkeley published the MAST study this year.

1,642
Execution Traces
7
Leading Frameworks
41 – 87%
Failure Rate on Real Tasks
36.9%
Coordination Failures Between Agents

It's not the model.

It's the architecture.

UC Berkeley Sky Computing Lab + CMU  ·  arXiv 2503.13657
agentsquadai.com/en
04 / 08
Agent
decides
Workflow
runs

Most "AI agents" in production
are workflows wearing a costume.

They get cheaper, faster, and more reliable
when you take the costume off.

agentsquadai.com/en
05 / 08

What survives in production.

01
A single reasoning loop calling deterministic tools.
02
Human approval where the stakes are real.
03
One trace to debug, not ten.

Reliability close to the model's own rate.

Not a compounding decay curve.

agentsquadai.com/en
06 / 08

Agent Squad is not a swarm.

3 teams in production. Each team with one disciplined reasoning loop.
No handoffs to multiply errors.

/ 01
Operations
/ 02
Content
/ 03
Projects

3 loops. 3 domains. Not 16 steps in a chain.

Same model.

Different architecture.

Different reliability.

agentsquadai.com/en
07 / 08

Before approving your next AI project,
run the math.

If the system gives you 60%,
you're not buying an agent.

teams      3
disciplined loops      3
reliability      close to the model
I want my Squad
agentsquadai.com/en
agentsquadai.com/en
08 / 08